468x60-TrafficMonsoon

Program Name: Traffic Monsoon Product/Service: Advertising… Processors: Payza, Solid Trust Pay… Pay Plan Type: RevShare… Basic Details: Launched On October 10, 2014… Earn 110% Hourly Shared Revenue… AdPacks Are $50.00 Each… 2% Daily Revenue Cap… Earn Extra Cash with Cash Links PTC Ads… Instant Withdrawals… 10% Referral Commission… No AdPack Limit… Surf 10 Sites Daily… No Repurchase Rule… Admin: Charles Scoville… How It Works: Read Home-About-Ad Plans-Security-FAQ page… 100% Referral Cash Back…

Thank You,                                                UPDATE: This Program Is Currently
Admin & Team                                          No Longer In Business, Due To SEC

P.S. Join with the Know How Team, because we know how to show you how to earn, we know how to be here daily to help you, and we know how to keep you content & updated.

Note: This is the end of our brief program description, and your comments are welcome. The information below is included to make it faster & easier for you to make a comment.
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________

We Will Provide and You Must Decide
We Do Not Review|We Leave It Up To You

“Why Reply? Whenever you reply with new program information here at Know How To Earn, you will be branding your brand/exposing your linked website/and helping others with their need to succeed.”

[Your very first post here at Know How To Earn will be manually approved by the admin as soon as possible after we receive it. However, any and all of your new posts will be posted here automatically!]

Here are some of the questions that you could answer below about the program above: (1) Who is the Admin, and what is his/her previous online history? (2) Can this Admin be trusted? (3) Is the Pay Plan and Referral Commission sustainable? (4) What is/are the main product(s) and/or service(s)? (5) Can you earn as a Free Member? (6) How long does it take to profit? (7) What is the minimum and maximum withdrawal amount? (8) Is the withdrawal instant or manual? (9) How Does The Program Work, and is it available worldwide? (10) Who is the Web Host, and is it a shared or dedicated server? (11) Is there security with SSL, Robot, and DDOS protection? (12) How long is the domain registration? (13) Is this program a legally registered company? (14) What is the “Who Is”? (15) Is this program Legit, or is it a Scam? (16) What is the best strategy to earn the most profit? (17) What are the daily requirements to earn? (18) What is the minimum and maximum purchase or investment amount? (19) Is the advertising responsive? (20) Is the support system responsive? (21) Is this program unique, or is it just a cookie-cutter-copy? (22) How long will it take to reach your BEP (Break Even Point)? (23) Are there any foreseeable future problems with this program? (24) How does this program compare to other current and similar programs? (25) What is your Honest Opinion, or final analysis, about this program? Please “keep it real” by revealing any personal bias that may sway your opinion one way, or the other. Also, try not to use “frivolous reasons” for any criticism(s). On the other hand, feel totally free to express yourself below, with no unnecessary restrictions. -Admin Answer one or more of the 25 questions above, or create & answer your own question(s).

P.S. You May Reply Again Anytime with new information, appropriate verification, to respond to a previous comment, to ask a question about this program, to update your original opinion, etc. For Some Free Advertising, you can add your website link below in the specified space provided.

“Before You Go, Leave A Reply Below,
and Let Us Know, What You Know,
so We Can Grow, From Your Info.”

On-Topic & Off-Topic: (A) You can defend any program… (B) You can briefly introduce yourself… (C) You can compare admins… (D) You can show payment screenshots… (E) You can be mad, glad, or sad about any program, but you must stay mostly on-topic, and never too far off-topic…

Your questions or comments are always welcome and appreciated here at Know How To Earn, but please do not spam… Show us some love, by using our program link above… We are always here to help and/or support you whenever it is necessary… You can subscribe, on the right side.

Note: Posted programs that “pass muster”, or scrutiny, may also be listed here eventually on an appropriate page. Disclaimer: We cannot guarantee the performance of any admin, or program.
Yes U Can: If someone asks a question, and you know the answer, you can answer the question.

42 thoughts on “Traffic Monsoon

  1. Admin|Update Post author

    🛑 SEC EXPOSED 🛑

    There are many who ask questions about the future. When will something happen? What will it be?

    I recognize this comes from a place of pain and stress. We just want to be relieved of the injustice which has fallen upon all of us because of PayPal’s sudden turn against our business, and the SEC twisting things around to paint an image of something that truly doesn’t exist.

    Foundation:
    It’s been proven that there is more than enough money to pay everyone what they have already earned, deliver the services, and have money to spare. There was no ponzi and that’s plain and clear to see. New sales weren’t needed to meet current obligations.

    Those who have been involved in TM for a while certainly have seen results in their advertising, and learned first hand that our services are not an illusion. When PayPal limited TM, certainly all who were involved for a while noticed a drop in visitors to their sites. This is something I don’t have to prove to anyone, because each of you experienced it for yourselves.

    All along I have always positioned the offers on TM as strictly advertising services. Video clips of me at meetings have been shared and spread to show most undoubtedly that I explained that when someone makes a purchase of an adpack, they receive the service they paid for. The transaction is complete. The money they spent was exchanged with the company for the service they paid for. Now that the money is held by the company, it was used to deliver the services, pay commissions to the sponsor, and from the remaining amount left over amounts were rewarded to people surfing ads in the traffic exchange.

    I’ve always been clear what is offered on TM. Anyone who thought TM was an investment were mistaken, plain and simple. TM never worked as an investment. it’s always worked as a business which sells ad services, and rewards people sales commissions for selling the services, and rewards people with cash and advertising credits for viewing other people’s websites. The money always came from the sales of services, meaning money the company ALREADY HAD in hand BEFORE issuing any commission or reward for surfing.

    Explanation:
    Pretty much everyone can see already that TM isn’t a ponzi and never offered any investment. So why did the SEC get involved? To protect people? They wanted to make sure people weren’t harmed from some ponzi scheme? How many people feel protected by how slow this is moving? Scheduling a hearing the SEC was so busy with so many other things, including vacation. So while you’re all suffering, they’re off enjoying themselves. They care about you?

    Simple. THEY WANT THE MONEY. All they had to do is freeze all the assets, get a temporary restraining order, and make it so it would be nearly impossible for us to defend ourselves!

    The image I’ve uploaded along with this post clearly indicates that part of the funds obtained by the SEC will go to the whistle-blower. PayPal. What benefit does PayPal have to work with the SEC to make TM look bad? They get a PAY OFF from the SEC.

    What does the SEC get for winning against TM? Well, looking at the image it’s clear. Only SOME of the money would go to the people involved in TM. The rest goes to the SEC’s treasury.

    The SEC plan to setup a website for members to submit a claim for money. It isn’t going to be found or even used by 100% of the people who’s money this is. Low percentage of people will know about it, and low percentage of people will even use it. The rest goes to the SEC.

    The receiver benefits from the money while she holds onto it. So you can imagine why she wants to work towards making TM look bad. She wants this case to last a long time too. Longer it lasts, the more she gets to use the money.

    In a system where the SEC and receiver benefit from seized assets, the motivations behind enforcement become questionable. They appear to be manipulating the system for their own gain! If the receiver and SEC didn’t benefit from seized or frozen assets, I believe they would be more likely to be honest and fair. Probably by now they would have already admitted they were wrong, or never even opened this case to begin with.

    Image Source http://www.gao.gov/assets/660/659760.txt

    -Charles Scoville|Admin

    Reply
  2. Admin|Update Post author

    🚦 Read Each Word Carefully 🚦

    I’ve said many times that by legal definition Traffic Monsoon should prevail in this case. I’m about to show you legal definitions to things so you can see for yourself I’m right.

    To determine if something is a ponzi, first it has to be an investment. If you truly review the TM website, there was no offer of any investment. If you review the videos uploaded by me to youtube, none of my content ever positioned services offered on TM as an investment.

    But with what was offered aside, there is a way to determine if something is an investment. First is whether there is an “investment contract.” Looking to the terms of service, the agreement made was purchases are for services and a non-investment.

    There’s another way to determine if there is an investment contract present. It’s called the Howey test. https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/328/293/case.html

    “The test of whether there is an “investment contract” under the Securities Act is whether the scheme involves an investment of money in a common enterprise with profits to come solely from the efforts of others.”

    SOLELY is the key word. Surfing to receive a reward substantially indicates there is no investment contract present, because the qualification to receive a reward by completing a task relies upon the efforts of the user, and not SOLELY upon the efforts of others. Since part of the definition of a ponzi is an investment scheme, right away it’s proven it’s not a ponzi.

    Let’s drill deeper. A ponzi solicits investors by telling the investors profits are obtained by using the investor’s money to invest in something else such as real estate, currencies, commodities, etc. The fraud in a ponzi, is the investor’s money isn’t actually being invested in anything, but simply being paid as returns to earlier investors.

    Another hallmark of a ponzi is a promised return. Traffic Monsoon doesn’t promise returns at all! A ponzi for example would claim it can return 60% profits in 6 months, and 120% profits in a year. The only way to meet those returns the ponzi must bring in more investors, and with each new investment into the scheme it falls further and further in debt. It’s in fact in debt from its very first investment, because they can’t possibly meet the obligations they’ve commited to within their investment contract.

    This means, money is not there first before people are “paid” on paper. So if people request their money to be paid to them, it’s delayed until they receive more money in.

    With Traffic Monsoon, money from ad service sales is already in hand before rewarding the surfers for completing the task. So if everyone asked to be paid at the same time, everyone could be paid without the need of more sales.

    As mentioned before, the SEC has failed to prove any fraud. They have failed to display a ponzi actually exists within the TM business model. Furthermore, they have failed to display an investment contract exists, and therefore they don’t actually have jurisdiction over the business.

    Not only does the SEC not have jurisdiction upon 100% of the business due to the above explanation, they most definitely don’t have jurisdiction over 90% of the business which came from outside the USA.

    According to REG-S within securities laws, sales of securities within the USA to customers outside the USA don’t need to be registered with the SEC because the SEC doesn’t have jurisdiction over the sales of securities outside the USA.

    So even if the SEC could prove TM was offering securities (which by legal definition they couldn’t!) they most certainly don’t have jurisdiction over 90% of the business!

    But since there is no investment being offered by legal definition and there actually is no ponzi scheme going on by legal definition, the SEC truly has no jurisdiction over 100% of the business.

    The Second Circuit Court of Appeals has defined a Ponzi scheme as:
    “a scheme whereby a corporation operates and continues to operate at a loss. The cooperation gives the appearance of being profitable by obtaining new investors and using those investments to pay for the high premiums promised to earlier investors. The effect of such a scheme is to put the corporation farther and farther into debt by incurring more and more liability and to give the corporation the false appearance of profitability in order to obtain new investors. Hirsch v. Arthur Anderson & Co., 72 F.3d 1085, 1088 n.3 (2d Cir. 1995)”
    https://www.law360.com/bankruptcy/articles/554968/is-your-investment-fund-a-ponzi-scheme-

    Another definition of Ponzi Scheme
    “A Ponzi scheme, simply put, is a business model that promises to pay out more money than it takes in.” http://emord.com/blawg/the-defining-characteristics-of-a-ponzi-scheme/

    Traffic Monsoon did not operate like that, period. As clearly displayed when a sale takes place commissions are paid, and money is held by the company. Surfers can then complete a task to be rewarded from the amount of money the company has received. In other words, there’s no debt, no loss, and certainly no promise to pay out more than the company receives in.

    It’s been clearly displayed that Traffic Monsoon truly has more than enough money to pay everyone what they have earned, and can deliver all purchased servies with money left to spare! This truly displays that Traffic Monsoon is not operating at a loss!

    Rewarding people for surfing from money the company received in ad service purchases. Company has the money first from the sales of services, and as people view ads the company rewards money never to exceed the amount already received. Very simple way to explain it. I am in the business of selling ad service, and built giving money to surfers from the sales of services into the business model.

    Charles Scoville|Admin

    Reply
  3. Admin|Update Post author

    A message from our CEO Charles (translated message via Sharon James):

    What Charles knows at this moment in time is that Judges do not have a time limit for making decisions on a civil matter this is NOT a Criminal case.

    Decisions can be made at any time we believe that the judge will make a decision as quickly as possible (as during my presence in court she said she knew how important how serious this is with the TRO and the Asset freeze) and the impact on Charles’ life and
    everyone else)

    Historically Civil cases have taken several months or even several years. However we are hopeful this will be resolved as quickly as possible. We also know based upon fact of Legal definition which our attorneys have done a fantastic job on bringing to the judges attention Is that There is NO INVESTMENT offered on Traffic Monsoon I am referring in terms to Investment Contracts under LAW.

    In other words ultimately the SEC does not have Jurisdiction over this business and is Over Reaching. We have also well defined what a Ponzi is and point by point proven by Legal definition that Traffic Monsoon is Not a Ponzi.

    We have also illustrated There is MORE than enough money to pay everyone what they have already earned and there is No Need to generate more Sales in order to make current obligations in delivering service and paying people what they have already earned.

    We have shown the judge that the business model has been fully and completely represented to the customer which explains to the customer what the offer and services are, and to those who intend to earn money on How to Earn, where the money comes, from tasks to perform rates and provides no guarantees of income and while surfing as a qualified member the pages in the traffic exchange does merit reward for Adpack buyers, we have also shown that rewards are always limited form actual sales revenues that the company already has in hand prior to issuing any reward for surfing in the traffic exchange and we have shown that this has been described fully on the website and within videos.

    So some how we wander why the judge is taking so long to make a decision on this case when it is So obvious and I believe the answer is because the judge over this case is not assigned to our case alone she has many different cases that she is responsible for multiple case before ours and multiple cases after ours and she is likely has a stack of cases she is working through and making decisions while at the same time working through a busy schedule being in court sitting on the bench being a judge for many other cases every day so we are waiting in line for the judge to reach our case it is in her stack and we hope that she takes the necessary steps time to review the business.

    How it lines up with Applicable Law and make a decision after it is thoroughly weighing out the facts. We also hope that she makes the decision based upon Law rather than have this case move forward to a Trial. We all want to see this resolved in the shortest amount of time as possible.

    The legal system within the US is a slow moving process and we will continue to working through each step of the way towards a WIN and I have posted many times about Legal definitions of things and shown some of the strong arguments we have in favour, and My requests to you is please to FORWARD those things on to people who have doubt.

    We have within us TRUE WINNING POTENTIAL and the #Truth is On our side. How long this will take? No one knows but of course timing in not on our hands but the hands of the judge and the process in place of the court system.

    -Anita Langley

    Reply
  4. Admin|Update Post author

    There’s been many people asking to know what’s happening. Welcome to the legal system of the United States of America. It’s slow, takes time, and we don’t know how much longer the road ahead is towards victory.

    The lawsuit was filed 26 July 2016. It’s now 17 Dec 2016. Many have been waiting to get paid what they have earned since 11 Jan 2016 when PayPal decided to limit the account and hold the money owed to people for the work they have done.

    We’re all wanting the waiting to be finished. There have been 3 hearing sessions, and the judge has taken things under advisement and we await any decision she makes. She might even call us back in for another hearing session. We don’t know anything yet. We’re waiting.
    The judge has not given a date or time frame she expects to provide any decision.

    We’ve clearly shown that traffic monsoon is solvent. We can deliver all traffic and pay everyone what they have earned. The judge specifically has asked the SEC to provide evidence of fraud, and the SEC wants the judge to ignore the website completely. The SEC continues to twist, manipulate, and blatantly lie.

    Some of the SEC’s arguments apparently have caused the judge to step back and reflect, but she isn’t buying everything they have said.
    Many of you have seen that Vemma had a lawsuit against them filed in 2015 with the FTC, which has recently been resolved. It takes time through the process. We’re taking one step at a time to clear the false accusations made against Traffic Monsoon. What the next steps will be will be determined by whatever the judge decides.

    We’re all hoping for the best, and we’re all tired of waiting. We all just want to get paid what we have earned and get back to work. We’re doing all we can, and we know this is a process.

    We haven’t heard anything yet from the judge. When the judge makes her decision we’ll let you know, but this might not be over anytime soon but who knows– it could be. All the time passing by since 11 Jan 2016 certainly has tested all of of our patience. It’s easy to give up and quit, but I just want you to know that although it can be discouraging at times, I haven’t given up.

    Thank you for all the support from those who also haven’t given up, but have given donations to the legal defense fund which was started by my parents.

    -Charles Scoville|Admin
    Facebook Group: United States TM Events

    Reply
  5. Admin|Update Post author

    Basically there are 2 ways to earn sales commissions on traffic monsoon.

    1. Refer customers to use the services.
    2. adpack customers are incentivized to view other people’s websites.

    I believe the core of the case pivots on a single difference of 2 separate ideas.
    -Idea 1. offering returns on investments. Traffic Monsoon says that’s not how it works. It clearly states not to be offering any investment just in case anyone might have thought so.
    -Idea 2. incentivizing customers of adpacks sales commissions when services are sold by viewing a qualifying number of websites in the traffic exchange. Traffic Monsoon says that this is what it’s doing.

    The difference is in a ponzi– if you offer a potential investor returns on investments, and the company can’t provide any promised returns unless the company solicits more investors, then the returns promised to the earlier investors (debt) is being paid by the deposits of new investors… and there now is a debt to the new investors which can only be satisfied by a newer investor making deposits. Each time that offer is extended, the debt multiplies, and crashes when everyone chooses to take their promised returns but the scheme doesn’t actually have money to pay everyone what the operator claims they have earned in returns.

    Within traffic monsoon, there is no offer of returns on investments. There is an offer of advertising service, and incentives to view ads: sales commissions. Commission meaning in the same way someone refers a customer to buy a service, that someone would earn 10% commission from their referred customer’s purchase. AdPack buyers can view a qualifying number of websites, which if there are sales of services they have placed themselves in position to receive a portion of also. If there are no sales, nothing is owed to them. At all times there is more than enough money to pay everyone what they have earned no matter what! Clearly not a ponzi, and hopefully the judge by now can see that distinguished difference between what traffic monsoon actually is, and what a ponzi actually is by definition.

    Regardless of what some people might have thought, or what the SEC wishes to allege… it comes down to a single truth. The actual offer extended, and the offer accepted based upon the words written on the website at the time of check-out, terms of service, and faq. At all times, in my videos, personally, private, publically, or anything else for that matter– I have remained consistent in my speech with what’s written on the website when it comes to what traffic monsoon is offering, and at all times any potential customer has full opportunity to see for themselves what the offer is. If they accept the offer by making a purchase, I should only be held accountable for what the offer was stated to be at the time of check-out, and on the website pages (ad plans page, member area videos, descriptions at check-out, terms of service, etc).

    If sales commissions for referring customers is unlimited, some of wondered why place a limit on adpack buyers qualifying to earn commissions by viewing websites.

    The incentive is meant to have proven buyers view other people’s websites. “buyer’s lists” are much more valuable than a list containing people who never buy anything. The more someone has spent, the more valuable their visit is on someone’s website. Therefore someone who spent more money on ad service would have higher incentives for doing the same amount of work. How valuable someone is (or how valuable each of their visits on a website is) is definitely determined by how much they have spent in ad services on traffic monsoon.

    How many adpacks someone has bought certainly is a realistic gauge for their value in viewing other people’s websites. Each adpack purchase has a max, so if the customer stops buying services on traffic monsoon that incentive is no longer there because they are no longer a buyer at that level. If they do continue to buy, that each of those positions would continue to indicate their value, and their incentives would be comparable with what they have spent. Those who do not continue to buy lose their value, and lose the incentive when they reach the max.

    The thing I notice is we have a very value driven membership base who recognize the value of their purchased services, and have continued to buy more – and thus, increasing the value of our advertising services we’re offering for sale.

    Think about it: If you were selling something, who would you most likely want to view your website? Someone who has never spent anything? Someone who has spent a little? Someone who has spent a lot? Why is it wrong for traffic monsoon to offer incentives which mirror the level of value the visitor is bringing to the customer’s websites?

    Why not cut those earnings off at $55 (instead of forever) in order for someone to either choose to maintain their value through buying more services, or stop being rewarded for no longer being an active buyer?

    If Daniel Wadley says it’s not a ponzi if those earnings are cut off at $50… (which are commissions from sales of services customers can qualify for by being the “buyer’s list” in delivering the services customers have paid for) .. then how could it be a ponzi if cutting off those commissions at $100, $150, $70, $10, $15, $35 or even $55 actually be any different, if the source of those “sales commissions” are from new (and existing) customers who are buying ad services, no matter which service is being bought the most?

    These are not “returns” – as it clearly specifies there is a no-refund policy. These are sales commissions. The same as when someone refers a customer to buy a service. The person who recommended the services to another is paid a 10% sales commission. The people who buy adpacks can earn sales commissions by viewing a qualifying number of websites (not banners).

    All effective companies function on profit margins. If it’s legal for the company to keep the profit margins of each sale which would be left over, what is so wrong with granting this amount of money to the people who are helping deliver the service for the customer? Especially if they are “buyer’s list” individuals who have proven spending power? The more someone has spent on ad services, the more valuable they are to the customers buying ads, and therefore their incentive for meeting the same qualifying number of ads would be higher.

    Hopefully the judge will see traffic monsoon is a business which operates from its sales, which of course like any business in the world would fail without sales from its customers and must find ways to remain relevant in the marketplace… but as long as the services remain relevant within the marketplace, and people want to buy the services offered on traffic monsoon, then like any business it should remain in business, and only go out of business if it loses traction within the marketplace, and loses relevancy.

    Charles Scoville, Admin

    Reply
  6. Admin|Update Post author

    It truly is incredible how many people are coming together for TM none of us have earned for almost 4 months and yet we are still here This goes to show you that TM has touched so many lives and to have our amazing CEO have his Freedom so let’ do this come on guys one last push do what you can over the next coming week.

    Many, many thanks for your very kind donations so far – we need to keep going in raising funds for our Incredible Attorneys – whatever you can afford to donate is very much appreciated.

    12 Days to go – 30th November – Our Day is Coming 🙂

    Please help fund our attorneys so that they can bring our business back to us where it rightly belongs.

    Do you have any funds in your Payza or Bitcoin that you can send across??

    You can make a donation via debit card or credit card by going to the Funded for Justice Campaign or sending a donation to the SLDF fund.

    Please go to the following website http://trafficmonsoon.org/legal.htm To see your preferred method of donation to our Attorneys fund

    1) Payza
    2) Bitcoin
    3) Funded for Justice Campaign – via Debit Card or Credit Card
    4) for donation above $300 please send direct to SLDF

    Thank you sooooo much to you all – every donation makes a difference

    LET’S DO THIS

    -Sharon James

    TM

    Reply
  7. Admin|Update Post author

    Anita Langley
    November 6 at 2:25am

    Fantastic Update via Sunil Patel

    From Don Olson

    I’ve had a lot of people ask me, “Don, what did you learn in the courtroom observing the SEC vs TM case. What are your thoughts?”

    My thoughts are simple:
    We will pound 3 nails into the SEC coffin and bury them.

    Nail number one– SEC believes TM is insolvent. Fact: Traffic Monsoon will always be solvent. Our TM Lawyer proved the SEC wrong with simple mathematics. TM will always have more money, than what is owed to the members accounts. Pound that Nail!

    Nail number two– SEC believes we don’t “really” have a product; Really? Not only does Traffic Monsoon offer “real” advertising services, but TM has been consistently number one in comparison with all other traffic exchanges. Pound that Nail!

    Nail number three– The SEC believes that every Traffic Monsoon customer who owns an adpack is guaranteed to receive $55 in revenue sharing. Our Terms and Conditions explicitly state that purchasing advertising is not an investment nor are members guaranteed to reach $55. From a legal perspective, as long as the T&C’s are conspicuously located on the website (which they are), the T&C’s will hold up in court. Pound that nail!

    In summary: The SEC has built their entire case around one false assumption: that an adpack owner is guaranteed to receive $55 in revenue sharing. Nothing can be further from the truth. We are going to inexorably pound and pound and pound these 3 nails until the SEC coffin is shut tight.

    Our lawyers, Loren Washburn and John Durkin, are intelligent, passionate, and competitive. They want to WIN this case. They have seen the injustice, the scorn, and the indignity the SEC has brought upon our intrepid leader, Charles Scoville. For our lawyers, this battle against the SEC has become personal. This case has become more than just winning. These lawyers watched the heartfelt, 4 hour video that Sunil Patel so graciously put together.

    These lawyers were blown away when they met Sharon James and the great Team Utah that flew thousands and thousands of miles to support Charles. They couldn’t believe how cohesive the Traffic Monsoon family is. They felt the love, the excitement, the energy, the truth, and the kindness that the Traffic Monsoon family exemplifies. It doesn’t matter what religion, what race, what country or what background we come from. We are all Family. We want justice for all. These lawyers are now part of our family, and they believe in Charles Scoville, and they believe in Traffic Monsoon, and they believe in all of us.

    Pound, pound, pound…….

    Reply
  8. Admin|Update Post author

    Anita Langley
    August 22 at 2:40pm · London, United Kingdom

    via Charles Scoville

    I’m so tired of seeing people say they lost their money in TM. First of all, you paid for an ad service. That’s what the website is offering to you. You made the purchase for the service. The terms of service clearly advises you not to spend more than you can afford on ad service. The site in multiple places advises you that your purchase is not an investment.

    Don’t you understand the impact on a business when PayPal is holding onto over $60 million ?? Do you think the company can’t pay you until that amount is released? Do you think that maybe that’s the reason I couldn’t use any of the money to buy the services on external websites to deliver your visitors faster?

    PayPal crippled the business with their limitation, and held onto funds longer than 180 days. I announced in a Manchester meeting that PayPal is releasing funds, but I didn’t make a big announcement because I did truly want to surprise people, and I knew I had to get to the USA and move the funds in person from my bank branch. I couldn’t transfer that much while I was with my wife in the UK.

    The last transfer to my bank from PayPal occurred (I believe) the 22nd of July. That Friday I attempted to book a ticket to the USA to move the funds into Payza, but there was a problem with my bank. Fraud alert was on my card and I had to wait until Monday to speak with my banker because he was in the mountains camping for the weekend.

    Not only was there this fraud alert on my card, but also I had received fraud alerts about checks being presented against the business account. I texted, emailed, and spoke with my bank account manager. I was told I needed to get into a branch to close that account down and open a new account. Since I was out of the country, I moved the funds to a seperate account within the same chase bank to protect the money from the risk. When I could get into the bank branch I could close that other account and open a new one, and transfer all the funds into Payza and start releasing people’s pending balances which had been on hold since PayPal’s limitation.

    Then, the SEC filed their lawsuit just as I was about to fly out. My apartment, car I bought in 2013, money, everything was gone. Everything frozen. This suddenly made me homeless and penniless overnight.

    There was way MORE than enough to pay everyone what they had earned, and deliver everyone’s services without any additional purchases. If no one paid a single cent more for service, the available money was more than enough to meet every single commitment to customers.

    There are people who want to blame me for not paying them. Wake up. PayPal had been holding onto that money. If they hadn’t held onto that money I would have paid you. Come on. Open your eyes! If the SEC didn’t grab hold of everything, I would have been into the bank branch and moved those funds for payouts, and everyone would have been paid what they earned. I’m not to blame here for people not getting paid what they earned. The root cause is PayPal, and now it’s the SEC. I didn’t scam anyone!

    Reply
  9. Admin|Update

    Traffic Monsoon

    Anita Langley
    August 8 at 3:06pm · London, United Kingdom

    If the event of Charles' Death Traffic Monsoon was safeguarded it has been put in place to carry out this business forward.

    These safeguards are in play, but he is not dead.

    We all together constitute traffic monsoon. This business is not just his. This is ours. We have benefited from the service. We earn money from this business. We all owe Charles a huge debt of thanks for all the time, effort, and sacrifice he made to make this service.

    We all stood behind this business. We have established this business. We should all stand proudly by our achievements together. This is our business, and I know you will not let all your hard work go down the tubes.

    We will not let this PayPal end the business. We will not allow this united states security and exchange commission stop this business.

    We know that the SEC is wrong. Charles does not provide any investment. Advertising is his service, and generously gives us surfers money from the company's profits.

    We need to stick together now more than ever.

    Is Charles Scoville behind this site? No, he is not. When he is cleared of these false allegations, we will be happy to put this site to him.

    This has nothing to do with Charles, because he has authorized in the event of death some will take action to carry on the business.

    Since he is not in the capacity of operating traffic monsoon, and has a court order not to operate Traffic Monsoon , and people needed to jump into action without any permission. We are for him to do so. We offer you, us, our team, and each member to do so.

    Now – we invite you to support the arrival of the monsoon in traffic monsoon surf with us, and the reason is Charles.

    We hope that this business will be back in this industry in full confidence.

    We believe that each member will login and surf out of sign of respect. Surf to get visitors to your website.

    Log in :- http://www.trafficmonsoon.plus

    Thank you very much my dearest friend.
    Anonymous Staff

    Reply
  10. Admin|Update Post author

    Update via Charles Scoville –

    My business in a nutshell: If you need website visitors, come surf for free and get yourself some visitors to your website. You want to buy some visitors instead of surf? Great. I’ll give you some visitors without you having to spend a whole lot for them. If you purchase an adpack, you’ll receive the ad service you selected and paid for. And you know- I recognize that I need not just buyers, but surfers too.

    So, if you buy an adpack and surf in the traffic exchange, I’ll go ahead and give you some of the money that comes into the company because of the sales of all the ad services on my website. I won’t pay you any more than $55, though – but whatever the company receives in ad sales, I’m going to give it to you as long as you surf a minimum number of ads. I recognize I wouldn’t be able to sell these services without surfers, so why not give some of these sales profits to the people who are doing the surfing?

    Simply because I’ve chosen to give the money that comes in from ad services sales to the people who surf, people are saying I’m such a terrible guy. Gain some perspective please people. Traffic Monsoon has never offered an investment, only ad service – and that’s it. I’ve chosen to simply pass the profit margins to the people who have chosen to buy the adpack service and who are actively surfing in the traffic exchange.

    There would never be any amount given to these surfers more than actual money received 24 hours or more ago. The company is not in debt. The company is not falling into debt. The amount members receive may go up or down depending upon sales of services sold, but the major factor is– people who tell others about the services offered on Traffic Monsoon earn far more than what people would receive through revenue sharing anyway.

    People have built up a real full-time income by selling these services to others. People depended upon this income to support their living expenses. Free members all around the world earning an extra bit of money to help them support their families clicking on cash links. Suddenly PayPal chose to part ways with Traffic Monsoon, and has held Traffic Monsoon account holder’s earnings for 180 days. This was a crushing blow to the people who truly depended upon this income, and had no other means to provide for their families.

    All this waiting, all this time, and people were finally feeling an excitement to finally get paid after so long. Then, the SEC files a lawsuit against Traffic Monsoon and me alleging that I’m operating some sort of illegal ponzi scheme. Choosing to give active surfers money for surfing ads is not a ponzi. Selling ad services is not illegal.

    But, through this, people have not understood the business model, they have not understood that PayPal truly was holding onto the money, and even now there is a lot of confusion about what the SEC is doing. I’m even confused why the SEC is doing this. They continuously label customers of ad services “investors” when in fact no one is an investor. Not in reality.

    -Anita Langley|Facebook

    Reply
  11. Admin|Update Post author

    Let us show the world that we are behind Charles Scoville and Traffic Monsoon 100%…

    -Anita Langley|Facebook

    Reply
  12. Admin|Update Post author

    Just in via Our Incredible CEO Charles Scoville

    Regardless of what you think. Traffic Monsoon has more money to pay everyone what they have earned… More money exists in the payment processors than is owed on member accounts for earnings… No matter what, there are profit margins… So even if everyone was buying adpacks, the profit margin was the only thing being shared on all the services anyway. Plus, the service purchased is labeled as a service, not an investment…

    And further in terms of service everyone agreed to upon signup, says that buying any service with traffic monsoon is not any form of an investment of any kind. Full disclosure of expectation always provided that qualifying to share in revenues by clicking minimum number of ads does not guarantee any amount you would receive .. but whatever profits generated by processing the sales of services you can surf and qualify to receive. Yes, a max of $55 was set, but there wasn’t ever a guarantee it would be reached. No time frame ever given.

    I have always done things to help and benefit everyone in this company. The hurt came from PayPal limiting funds. I have always done everything to help lift people, benefit people, and help people achieve something more.. Even the services themselves rank among the best advertising services online.

    Just remember I have always worked for the good of members. Always.. Even if plans I released didn’t work out and I was called a liar.. it was me who at least tried hard to work for all of you ever step of the way since day 1.

    When people wonder why I didn’t release news that paypal released funds. It took time to request all the funds. July 11th I learned. So I tested it out by sending $100,000 to my bank. I waited to see if it actually came. A few days later I found that they came. I started withdrawing more from PayPal. It took 255 requests to request the total I was able to withdraw. I didn’t request it all out in 1 sitting. It took time time. Because I knew it would take time to move the funds out of PayPal, I didn’t release that this was happening. I wanted to first get them into Payza then release to the public that PayPal had released some funds. I wanted it to be “BOOM” it’s there. I didn’t want to tell people PayPal released funds but not be able to do anything. I wanted to tell people this had happened when I could do something, and actually have the balances released!

    I didn’t have statistics to show me which services revenue came from. to me it didn’t matter. Reason is because what was shared was profit margin regardless of service purchased.

    Revenue was there and more money existed than was on member balances.

    I definitely have shown what was in processors and how much more was there compared to member balances. Ponzis DO NOT have enough money to pay people what they have earned. Traffic Monsoon DOES.

    -Anita Langley|Facebook

    Reply
  13. Admin|Update Post author

    Update #1…
    PayPal started to release funds. I needed to get to the USA to make the transfer from my bank to Payza. I wanted to surprise everyone with an early release after the money was inside of Payza.

    Fake checks were circulating around using the bank account and routing numbers made available online for customers purchasing services, so I moved the funds out of the business account until I could get to the USA, go into a chase branch, and send those funds to payza. Then, surprise members with an early release.

    The SEC filed a lawsuit. We’ll stand up against their claims in a court of law. Whatever is going on we’ll get to the bottom of it. There’s more money in existance to pay people than what people have earned.

    There’s no promised “returns” as I have always said, and the website and my videos doesn’t say anything of the sort.. I’ve never guaranteed 10% returns.. only that as we sell ad service people who click ads in the traffic exchange can qualify to share in revenues up to a maximum of $55 .. without any time frame affixed whatsoever.

    People had been circulating fake checks using bank account and routing number info provided online.. I moved the funds out from the business account into my personal account to avoid those from clearing, also– I intended to send those funds to payza as the note on that transfer indicates. I just couldn’t make that large of a transfer to pay people what they had earned until I was able to go into a chase branch.

    I didn’t pay myself that money. I was positioning that money to be sent to payza, but I wasn’t given a chance to do that because I hadn’t been able to go into a chase branch since I was out of the country.

    I was definitely sharing profit margins with people as I have outlined. No investment is offered on traffic monsoon as it clearly states. No promise of returns — only promise of ad service, with an explanation that people can click through ads and qualify to share in the revenues, which couldn’t possibly be guaranteed.

    I was just about to fly to Utah to make that transfer and surprise everyone with an early release to some of the positions and balances.

    -Charles Scoville|Admin

    Update #2…
    Good news. I spoke with the SEC this evening, and they have been so kind and wonderful. They have recognized I have been very honest and open with them about everything, and they recognize my pure intentions behind this business. They know and can confirm that the reason I moved funds to my personal account previously to coming to the USA was to protect people’s money from these fraudulent checks circulating.

    They feel we can work something out that allows Traffic Monsoon to move forward through restructuring. More discussions will follow, but I have expressed to them that I want to find through creativity working together with the SEC a way to make everyone happy, or at least say: “oh, it’s not that bad!” Additional conversations and meetings with them will follow.

    More updates to come when they’re made available.

    -Charles Scoville|Admin

    Reply
  14. Admin|Update Post author

    I didn’t expect such amazing response! – With the announcement of 50 ads per day, we actually have seen a significant jump in revenues from the average (above $1.5 Million per day) it went up to $2.1 million. I thought you might all be happy to see these statistics!

    If you think it will be harder to click or introduce people to TM now because of 50 ad click requirement, others are finding it easier because it brings greater strength to the business, adds even more confidence, helps us deliver visitors faster, and potential to share even more revenues with members.

    Best Regards,

    Charles Scoville
    Owner – Traffic Monsoon

    Reply
  15. Admin|Update Post author

    There’s a new change coming soon to Traffic Monsoon… Aimed to achieve the following:

    – Better Services
    – Better Alexa Rank
    – Strengthen the Business
    – Earn Better
    – Get You More Visitors To Your Websites

    … and it will take you less than 1 minute of your time each day 🙂

    More info to be released soon…

    -Charles Scoville|Admin

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

two × four =