You are here

Traffic Monsoon

468x60-TrafficMonsoon

Program Name: Traffic Monsoon Product/Service: Advertising… Processors: Payza, Solid Trust Pay… Pay Plan Type: RevShare… Basic Details: Launched On October 10, 2014… Earn 110% Hourly Shared Revenue… AdPacks Are $50.00 Each… 2% Daily Revenue Cap… Earn Extra Cash with Cash Links PTC Ads… Instant Withdrawals… 10% Referral Commission… No AdPack Limit… Surf 10 Sites Daily… No Repurchase Rule… Admin: Charles Scoville… How It Works: Read Home-About-Ad Plans-Security-FAQ page… 100% Referral Cash Back…

Thank You,                                                UPDATE: This Program Is Currently
Admin & Team                                          No Longer In Business, Due To SEC

P.S. Join with the Know How Team, because we know how to show you how to earn, we know how to be here daily to help you, and we know how to keep you content & updated.

Note: This is the end of our brief program description, and your comments are welcome. The information below is included to make it faster & easier for you to make a comment.
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________

We Will Provide and You Must Decide
We Do Not Review|We Leave It Up To You

“Why Reply? Whenever you reply with new program information here at Know How To Earn, you will be branding your brand/exposing your linked website/and helping others with their need to succeed.”

[Your very first post here at Know How To Earn will be manually approved by the admin as soon as possible after we receive it. However, any and all of your new posts will be posted here automatically!]

Here are some of the questions that you could answer below about the program above: (1) Who is the Admin, and what is his/her previous online history? (2) Can this Admin be trusted? (3) Is the Pay Plan and Referral Commission sustainable? (4) What is/are the main product(s) and/or service(s)? (5) Can you earn as a Free Member? (6) How long does it take to profit? (7) What is the minimum and maximum withdrawal amount? (8) Is the withdrawal instant or manual? (9) How Does The Program Work, and is it available worldwide? (10) Who is the Web Host, and is it a shared or dedicated server? (11) Is there security with SSL, Robot, and DDOS protection? (12) How long is the domain registration? (13) Is this program a legally registered company? (14) What is the “Who Is”? (15) Is this program Legit, or is it a Scam? (16) What is the best strategy to earn the most profit? (17) What are the daily requirements to earn? (18) What is the minimum and maximum purchase or investment amount? (19) Is the advertising responsive? (20) Is the support system responsive? (21) Is this program unique, or is it just a cookie-cutter-copy? (22) How long will it take to reach your BEP (Break Even Point)? (23) Are there any foreseeable future problems with this program? (24) How does this program compare to other current and similar programs? (25) What is your Honest Opinion, or final analysis, about this program? Please “keep it real” by revealing any personal bias that may sway your opinion one way, or the other. Also, try not to use “frivolous reasons” for any criticism(s). On the other hand, feel totally free to express yourself below, with no unnecessary restrictions. Answer one or more of the 25 questions above, or create & answer your own question(s).

P.S. You May Reply Again Anytime with new information, appropriate verification, to respond to a previous comment, to ask a question about this program, to update your original opinion, etc. For Some Free Advertising, you can add your website link below in the specified space provided.

“Before You Go, Leave A Reply Below,
and Let Us Know, What You Know,
so We Can Grow, From Your Info.”

On-Topic & Off-Topic: (A) You can defend any program… (B) You can briefly introduce yourself… (C) You can compare admins… (D) You can show payment screenshots… (E) You can be mad, glad, or sad about any program, but you must stay mostly on-topic, and never too far off-topic…

Your questions or comments are always welcome and appreciated here at Know How To Earn, but please do not spam… Show us some love, by using our program link above… We are always here to help and/or support you whenever it is necessary… You can subscribe, on the right side.

Note: Posted programs that “pass muster”, or scrutiny, may also be listed here eventually on an appropriate page. Disclaimer: We cannot guarantee the performance of any admin, or program.
Yes U Can: If someone asks a question, and you know the answer, you can answer the question.

54 Thoughts to “Traffic Monsoon”

  1. Admin|Update

    Story about TM (Traffic Monsoon) on Coin Desk website.
    -Charles Scoville

    Initial Coin Offerings: Where the SEC Might Stand

  2. Admin|Update

    Watch this video (below) what people said about Mark Cuban at the time the SEC filed a lawsuit against him. Listen to what all the anchors and experts said about Mark Cuban’s SEC case.

    “Your client, Mark Cuban, is saying he’s innocent. I’ve read the complaint from the SEC; the civil complaint we should point out, and it looks like they have a pretty darn good case. I mean they lay it out very clearly and concisely. How do you defend against it?”

    Guess what, Mark Cuban won–

    Why did he win? Because by law he hadn’t done anything wrong. That’s the same thing in our case. I keep displaying legal definitions and laws how they are written so you can see what happened to Mark Cuban is happening to me. False allegation are impacting me, my life, and everyone involved in TM.

    I’m fighting back against the SEC for what they are doing to each of us. Thank you all for your support and fighting back with us. We’re not giving up until we win!

    The District Court Clerk was given a deadline to confirm the record on the 10th Circuit is complete, and if not to supply anything missing. That deadline was 22 May. The district court missed the deadline. There is a new deadline for 5 June. The district court confirmed the record is complete on 26 May. We’ll be filing the opening brief and appendix either in July or Aug. So nothing new will happen for a while. I just keep posting so people see I’m not leaving this be. I’m going to fight until we win.

    (NOTICE: In Mark Cuban’s case the SEC tried to make him look like an insider trader when he actually wasn’t an insider. The SEC is trying to twist Traffic Monsoon into being a ponzi even though there was no offer for an investment, no common enterprise, no promise of returns, and the business can payout every account balance and deliver all purchased services, etc)

    The receiver lied, by the way, of having no records. In your back office everything was accounted. Your payment history, amount you earned and where it came from, which referral.. Cash link clicks and so on. Every bit of financial detail was tracked down to the .00000001 … Such b.s. to say there are no financial records. I hate all the lies from the receiver so much

    On your purchase history it displayed purchase was from which payment processor or using account balance. Everything was fully recorded. There is no lacking in records

    -Charles Scoville|Admin


    Mark Cuban’s Attorney Defends SEC Allegations: Mark Cuban’s attorney Christopher Clark defends the SEC’s insider trading allegations on FOX Business Network’s Happy Hour

  3. Admin|Update

    I know many people don’t understand the legal process in the USA. Some people think the opinion on a preliminary injunction is the end. It’s NOT.

    Interlocutory = Provisional; interim; temporary; not final;

    Even if we didn’t appeal the interlocutory decision the case would be far from over. Remember, there is a discovery period. Since the SEC’s case is weak, this period would probably be long. In Mark Cuban’s SEC case, for example, the case was so weak discovery lasted years. After 5 years the case came down to a trial with a jury which lasted only a couple of weeks.

    Jurors found the information Cuban acted on wasn’t confidential and that he hadn’t promised not to trade on it. This means by legal definition he hadn’t done any insider trading.

    Keep in mind, before getting to a trial by jury Mark Cuban had a judge who allowed the SEC to prevail on a preliminary injunction just like us.

    I believe when push comes to shove– Jurors will find that Traffic Monsoon wasn’t offering any investment and certainly didn’t promise any returns. I believe they will see that Traffic Monsoon simply sold ad service, and with money the company already had- rewarded surfers for viewing websites and offers.

    The company is solvent, and certainly wasn’t in debt and also wouldn’t have gone in debt because it only would have rewarded money it had already received and within the profit margin. That means TM isn’t a ponzi!

    While each of us see this as an open/shut case– so was Mark Cuban’s case. I’m sure they were shocked that the SEC prevailed on the preliminary injunction too.

    We’re appealing the preliminary injunction decision– but even if the SEC prevails on the preliminary injunction appeal, it wouldn’t be the end. We still would have discovery and a trial– and I believe it’s so clear what was offered, and what was not offered when viewing the website, my videos, terms of service, faq, and even the check-out page when people were making a purchase of an advertising services.

    Yes, unpromised rewards for surfing were offered for surfing, but since it used money the company already had received and within the profit margin– we feel very confident that we’ll be able to prove that a ponzi didn’t exist within Traffic Monsoon.

    A ponzi = an offered investment pooling money promising returns from an investment project, but the investment project doesn’t exist.. the operator is providing promised returns from new investments. It’s always in debt because returns promised are always more than the amount of money invested. More investors are needed to keep up with the promised returns.

    Clear as day– Traffic Monsoon wasn’t offering an investment, wasn’t offering to pool money invested to place into any investment project, and surf rewards certainly are not returns on an investment. There were no promises what surf rewards would be– only a maximum– which means since there is no promise, there is no debt.

    The company can fully keep all its commitments- which means every account balance can be fully cashed-out — and all services can be delivered without more sales.

    Charles Scoville|Admin

  4. Admin|Update

    The interlocutory opinion of the judge was that this is NOT the run-of-the-mill ponzi scheme (but she says it is one nonetheless), probably she said that it’s not a typical ponzi because there was no investment offered, no promised returns, and the misrepresentation element was also missing. Everything had been fully disclosed how things work and operated honestly.

    Judge Jill Parrish simply recognized that rewards for surfing is coming from money the company already legitimately owned from customer purchases of services.. change that to the SEC’s narrative and adpacks are investments and its returns paid from investors buying adpacks, and they claim surfing was just to skirt the law.. but the actual reality is– Traffic Exchanges reward surfers, and Traffic Monsoon’s surf rewards were given by the company from company’s money it had because of the sale of service. Adpacks are a service, and not an investment.

    Ponzis also don’t typically reward people using money they already have. They need more money to cash-out interest they promised their investors and fraudulently made appear they already had through some investment project– The investment project in a ponzi doesn’t exist, and returns are only coming from investors– and because of that.. without more investors they wouldn’t have the money to keep up with the promised returns or cover the payout without new investors.

    Traffic Monsoon didn’t need new customers to cover account balances. 100% of all member account balances could be fully cashed out without more sales. All services can also be delivered without more sales and without surfers. Traffic Monsoon was not in debt.

    Ponzi schemes try to keep new money flowing in to keep up with the cash-out requests, but Traffic Monsoon didn’t need new sales in order to cash-out all of the account balances. So there’s many elements of a typical ponzi scheme which are missing, which means a ponzi actually doesn’t exist within Traffic Monsoon.

    Interlocutory = Provisional; interim; temporary; not final;

    Appellate courts have the discretion to review interlocutory orders. The federal courts of appeal are governed by the Interlocutory Appeals Act (28 U.S.C.A. § 1292). This act grants discretion to the courts of appeal to review interlocutory orders in civil cases where the district judge states in the order that a controlling question of law is in doubt and that the immediate resolution of the issue will materially advance the ultimate termination of litigation.

    I believe that since the offer was for ad service, no investment was offered, and no returns were promised — that the case SHOULD resolve in our favor, and taking this interlocutory decision on appeals COULD bring the truth to light– that surf rewards came from company’s money NOT from investor money. There were no investors; only customers. When a customer made a purchase of service their money was given to the company for the service being provided to the customer.

    The time frame for the appeals process is unknown. It could take a year, it could be less, or it could be more.

    Charles Scoville|Admin

Leave A Comment

sixteen − 6 =